Often, what seems like an obviously smart practice to people in business, feels like discrimination to people who are single. I have discussed this dilemma often, starting in Singled Out and continuing in various articles and blog posts.
- The Business-Person’s Dilemma: Charge Singles More and Incur their Wrath, or Make Less Money? (And is this really the most accurate framing of the issue?)
Per person, single people pay $100 more for membership in a film society than two people who join as a couple.
Enterprise charges more to rent a car with a friend than with a spouse.
An essay in the Guardian (newspaper) argues that marketers love single people. Is this contrary to all of the ways in which companies shortchange singles by charging them more per person than they charge couples?
This article is not specifically about business practices, but some of the issues are the same.
Facebook group for calling out unfair (and fair) practices relevant to single people
2. Stopping Singlism in the Marketplace, the Workplace, Advertising, and Beyond
The most comprehensive set of discussions of singlism in various domains, and ways of stopping it, is in the book, Singlism: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Stop It. (Paperback is here; ebook is here.) Here are some blog posts on the topic.
I discuss the New York Times article that takes on the single supplement, and acknowledges travel companies that are starting to offer better deals to solo travelers.
I discuss a big story in a leading magazine in the advertising industry about the growing importance of solos, and the businesses already offering them good deals.
I invite readers to submit names and descriptions of singles-friendly or –unfriendly businesses
Here are readers’ nominations for singles-friendly and –unfriendly establishments.
What we can do to stop singlism, in the marketplace and beyond
What would qualify as a singles-friendly workplace?